• Robert Spicer

Working time: rest breaks: opting out


Rest periods


Case R (on the application of the Fire Brigades Union v South Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority (2018) Morning Star, September 7, High Court

Facts S introduced a CPC shift system at four fire stations in March 2012. The system involved 96 hours continuous duty with compensatory rest if crew members were called out at night. Anyone who volunteered for the system had to sign an opt-out from regulation 4 of the Working Time Regulations (WTR). Those who volunteered received extra pay. The FBU applied for judicial review, arguing that the CPC system breached regulations 6 and 10 of WTR.

Regulation 6 of WTR states that a night worker’s hours should not exceed eight hours in each 24 hour period. Workers cannot opt-out, nor bring tribunal proceedings for a breach of the regulation.

Regulation 10 states that workers are entitled to a rest period of not less than 11 consecutive hours in each 24 hour period of work.

Decision 1. Regulation 6 had been breached but the court would not grant relief because to do so would be to declare that the conduct of S was criminal.

  1. In relation to regulation 10, the position of S was untenable. The breach was blatant and obvious. The court granted a declaration that the CPC shift system was contrary to the rights of firefighters under regulation 10.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Disability: burden of proof

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION Burden of proof Case Bennett v Mitac Europe Ltd EA-2020-000349-LA Facts B and his manager were employed by M. The manager became disabled, suffering from cancer. The employer

Unfair dismissal: drugs test: contributory conduct

UNFAIR DISMISSAL Contributory conduct Case Renewi UK Services v Pamment EA-2021-000584-DA Facts R tested positive for cannabis as part of a random drugs test. He was dismissed on the basis that he had

Gig economy: new case on meaning of "worker"​

WORKER Provision of services personally Case Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine [2021] EWCA Civ 1514, Court of Appeal Facts A worked as a courier, delivering goods by moped, for SDL from November 2016 to