• Robert Spicer

Worker or employee or self-employed? Another tribunal decision

CONTRACTS OF EMPLOYMENT

Mutuality of obligation

Case Capita Translations v Slauclunas and another (2017) Morning Star, April 7, EAT

Facts The Ministry of Justice entered into a framework agreement with A Ltd which was then acquired by CT to provide interpreters as and when required by tribunals and courts. S was registered with CT as a Lithuanian speaker and was told by CT about vacancies for appointments. S entered into an interpreting services agreement with CT. this required him to comply with a dress code. He was paid by the day with no provision for holiday pay, sick pay or pension and he was responsible for his own tax. S complained that he had been subjected to less favourable treatment in comparison with Russian language interpreters by reason of his race and his religious or philosophical beliefs. The ET found that S was an employee. He was under a contract to do the work personally and he was in a position of subordination. The lack of mutuality was not relevant. CT appealed to the EAT.

Decision 1. The ET judge had misdirected herself in law by failing to consider the issue of mutuality of obligation.

2. The matter should be remitted to a differently constituted tribunal for rehearing.

3. Each ET must decide cases based on its own findings of fact and its own interpretation of the law.



Recent Posts

See All

RECENT EMPLOYMENT-RELATED CASES

DAMAGES Lost years of earnings Case Head v Culver Heating Co Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 34 Facts H was the managing director of EMSL, his own heating and ventilation company. He was negligently exposed to as

More recent employment cases

RACE DISCRIMINATION Harassment Stale training Case Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen UKEAT/0031/20/AT Facts G, a man of Indian origin, was employed by A in October 2016. In August 2017 he told his line manager