top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Disability discrimination: wheelchair user: FirstGroup bus: no compensation:Supreme Court

Reasonable adjustments

Case FirstGroup plc v Paulley [2017} IRLR 258, Supreme Court

Facts P, a wheelchair user, tried to catch a bus operated by F. The wheelchair space on the bus was occupied by a woman with a sleeping child in a pushchair. She refused to move when asked to do so by the driver. The driver refused to allow P to fold down his wheelchair and use an ordinary seat. P complained of disability discrimination on the basis that F had failed to make reasonable adjustments to its policies. The county court allowed the claim and awarded him £5000 compensation. The court found that there was a PCP of £first come first served”. Possible reasonable adjustments would have included posting a notice which positively required a non-disabled passenger occupying a space to move from it if a wheelchair user needed it. F successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal and P appealed to the Supreme Court.

Decision 1. The appeal was allowed.

2. Good practice would have been a policy to encourage drivers to go as far as they thought appropriate to induce a recalcitrant passenger to reconsider his or her refusal.

3. The award of damages would not be upheld. P had not established that if an adjustment had been made, there was at least a real prospect that it would have made a difference. There was no finding by the county court that if F had phrased the notice more peremptorily and/or required its drivers to be more forceful, that requirement would have been satisfied, given that there would have been no question of actual enforcement.

Recent Posts

See All

VICARIOUS LIABILITY

Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil

Kommentit


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page