top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Disability discrimination: risk to health


Risk to health

Secondment opportunity

Case Judd v Cabinet Office EA-2020-000468-AT

Facts J, a disabled person employed by CO, successfully applied for secondment in Montenegro. This was withdrawn after CO was advised that J would be at high risk to her health if she was seconded. It was accepted that the withdrawal was unfavourable treatment arising from her disability. It was also agreed that the withdrawal had the legitimate aim of protecting the health, safety and wellbeing of secondees when working abroad. The issue was whether this was a proportionate step. The ET found that the withdrawal was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. J appealed to the EAT.

Decision 1. The appeal was dismissed.

2. The grounds of appeal included arguments that the ET had misdirected itself, had failed to consider reasonable adjustments, raised unfounded criticisms which did not undermine the ET’s reasoning.

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page