• Robert Spicer

Disability discrimination: risk to health


Risk to health

Secondment opportunity

Case Judd v Cabinet Office EA-2020-000468-AT

Facts J, a disabled person employed by CO, successfully applied for secondment in Montenegro. This was withdrawn after CO was advised that J would be at high risk to her health if she was seconded. It was accepted that the withdrawal was unfavourable treatment arising from her disability. It was also agreed that the withdrawal had the legitimate aim of protecting the health, safety and wellbeing of secondees when working abroad. The issue was whether this was a proportionate step. The ET found that the withdrawal was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. J appealed to the EAT.

Decision 1. The appeal was dismissed.

2. The grounds of appeal included arguments that the ET had misdirected itself, had failed to consider reasonable adjustments, raised unfounded criticisms which did not undermine the ET’s reasoning.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil