• Robert Spicer

Workplace hand injuries: company fined £300,000

Hand crush injuries: £300,000 fine

Health and Safety Executive v Heathcoat Fabrics Ltd (2017) Exeter magistrates’ court, August 22

Statutory reference: regulation 11of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER).

The facts

· In August 2014 Anthony Seward, an employee of Heathcoat Fabrics, a textile company, was preparing a piece of machinery for the next shift when his hand was drawn into rotating rollers. He suffered severe crush injuries to his hand and four of his fingers were partially amputated.

· The company had failed to safeguard dangerous machinery. It had provided a guard but when it ceased to function it was not repaired but instead was replaced with an emergency stop wire.

· The wire was kept in place for more than two years and was replaced th day after the incident.

The decision

The company was fined £300,000 plus £2800 costs under regulation 11 of PUWER.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

GPT- 3 and how it can revolutionise the legal industry?

GPT-3 is a piece of software that can predict what the next word will be in the specific text. It can repeatedly do that, to the point where it can write a text that is almost identical to human writi

DoNotPay and popular facial recognition tools

Legal tech company DoNotPay is best known for its army of “robot lawyers” — automated bots that tackle boringonline tasks like canceling TV subscriptions and requesting refunds from parking meters. No