top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Whistleblowing and employment tribunal procedure


Protected disclosures

Claim form

Case Clarke v The Restaurant Group (UK) Ltd EA-2019-001107-RN

Facts C, a litigant in person, made a complaint to the ET. The ET judge found that there were two complaints. These were ordinary unfair dismissal and breach of contract. C argued that her claim form had shown that she had sought to complain of unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure. C had written a letter which the ET had treated as an application for reconsideration. This had not been determined. C appealed to the EAT.

Decision 1. The appeal was allowed.

2. The ET judge had been wrong to preclude a possible protected disclosure complaint.

3. A complaint should only be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in the clearest of cases.

4. C had done enough in the claim form to indicate that she was seeking to pursue a protected disclosure complaint.

5. The particulars in the claim form did not properly explain the protected disclosure issues but she was a litigant in person and the issues could properly be explored at the initial consideration stage.


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page