top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Unsafe scaffolding: suspended prison sentence

Unsafe scaffold work: suspended prison sentence

Health and Safety Executive v Steven David Connolly (2018) Medway magistrates’ court, June 26

Statutory reference: regulations 6 and 8 of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 (WAH).

Steven David Connolly, a scaffolder, has been sentenced following unsafe working practices.

The facts

  • In August 2016 Connolly was working at a site in Chatham. An HSE inspector observed him using unsafe working practices when erecting scaffolding.

  • He was at serious risk of falling from the scaffold. He refused to work safely and abused the inspector. He left the scaffold in an unsafe and incomplete condition with no warning for subsequent users. He refused to provide his identity.

The decision

Connolly was sentenced to 24 weeks imprisonment suspended for 18 months. He was also ordered to be electronically tagged and to be subject to a curfew between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. at his home address, plus £2000 costs.

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page