top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Paper coating machine fire: worker seriously injured

Fire on paper coating machine: £16,000 fine

Health and Safety Executive v Olympic Varnish Company (2017) Portsmouth magistrates’ court, August 17

Statutory reference: regulation 6 of the Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmospheres Regulations 2002 (DSEAR).

The facts

· In July 2015 an employee of Olympic Varnish Company, a paper coating company, used a highly-flammable liquid to clean rollers on a coating machine.

· The liquid ignited and the worker suffered severe burn injuries.

· The company had not ensured that risks from the use of highly flammable liquids had been eliminated or reduced.

The decision

The company was fined £16,000 plus £4500 costs under regulation 6 of DSEAR.

An HSE inspector commented after the case that if a suitable safe system of work had been in place before the incident, the serious injuries suffered by the employee could have been prevented.

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page