• Robert Spicer

Nottingham City Council fined after apprentice injured

Lawnmower hand injuries: local authority fined £33,000

Health and Safety Executive v Nottingham City Council (2017) Nottingham Crown Court. May 25

Statutory reference: s.2 of the Health and Safety at Work, etc, Act 1974 (HSWA); regulation 9 of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and regulations 3 and 5 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR).

Nottingham City Council has been fined following an incident in which an apprentice suffered serious hand injuries.

The facts

· In August 2014 an apprentice employed by the council was using a lawnmower at a primary school in Nottingham. The machine became blocked and he tried to clear the blockage. his hand came into contact with the machine’s rotating blade.

· His right index finger was severed and he suffered serious lacerations of other fingers on his right hand.

· The council had removed some of the manufacturer’s safety measures and replaced them with its own, which were not to the required safety standard.

· The council had failed to suitably control the risks posed by the machinery in use and had not fully considered training needs of workers to operate it in a safe and appropriate manner. There had also been failures in levels of supervision of apprentices.

The decision

Nottingham City Council was fined £33,000 plus £12,000 costs for breaches of s.2 HSWA, regulation 9 of PUWER and regulations 3 and 5 of MHSWR.

Recent Posts

See All


England’s coronavirus ban on evictions came to an end on May 32, 2021. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has reported that 400,000 private renters have been served with eviction notices or told to expect


DAMAGES Lost years of earnings Case Head v Culver Heating Co Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 34 Facts H was the managing director of EMSL, his own heating and ventilation company. He was negligently exposed to as

More recent employment cases

RACE DISCRIMINATION Harassment Stale training Case Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen UKEAT/0031/20/AT Facts G, a man of Indian origin, was employed by A in October 2016. In August 2017 he told his line manager