top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Heathrow crushing death: Laing O’Rourke fined £800,000

Construction company fined £800,000 following Heathrow crushing death

Health and Safety Executive v Laing O’Rourke Construction Ltd (2017) Southwark Crown Court, March 24

Statutory reference: regulation 22 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (CDM).

Ling O’Rourke Construction Ltd has been fined following the death of a worker in a crushing incident.

The facts

· In October 2014 Phillip Griffiths and his brother were trying to move a broken-down scissor lift on a service road at Heathrow Airport.

· Griffiths’ brother tried to tow the vehicle away, using a dumper truck. His foot was caught between the brake and the accelerator. The truck reversed and crushed Griffiths, causing fatal injuries.

· Neither worker had been authorised with the appropriate certificate to use the dumper truck. The operation had not been properly overseen or managed.

The decision

The company was fined £800,000 plus £10,000 costs under regulation 22 of CDM.

Recent Posts

See All

VICARIOUS LIABILITY

Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil

Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page