• Robert Spicer

Farm worker entangled in netting: £30,000 fine for employer

Worker entangled in netting: head injury: £30,000 fine

Health and Safety Executive v M Baker Produce Ltd (2017) Lincoln magistrates’ court, August 9

Statutory reference: regulations 11 and 16 of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR).

The facts

· In June 2015 a farm worker was working on a farm near Boston, Lincolnshire. Netting was being removed from a crop on the ground using a tractor with a net winding machine.

· The netting caught the worker’s glove. He was entangled in the netting and drawn onto the machine’s rotating reel and suffered head injuries and concussion.

· M Baker Produce Ltd, a vegetable growing company, had failed to properly plan the work and had not defined a safe system of work.

· The machine was not fitted with a trip device to stop the rotation of the reel. There was no emergency stop device which could be reached from ground level.

The decision

· The company was fined £30,000 plus £6800 costs under regulation 11 of PUWER for failing to ensure that measures were taken to stop movement of the machine before anyone entered a danger zone; regulation 16 of PUWER for failing to provide a readily accessible emergency stop, and under regulation 3, MHSWR, for failing to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment.

Recent Posts

See All


Gender-critical beliefs In the case of Forstater v CGD Europe, Ms F worked under a consultancy agreement as a researcher and writer with CGD, a think tank. She believes that sex is biologically immuta


England’s coronavirus ban on evictions came to an end on May 32, 2021. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has reported that 400,000 private renters have been served with eviction notices or told to expect


DAMAGES Lost years of earnings Case Head v Culver Heating Co Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 34 Facts H was the managing director of EMSL, his own heating and ventilation company. He was negligently exposed to as