top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Fall from aircraft: Stansted Airport: serious injuries: £160,000 fine

Fall from aircraft: serious injuries: £160,000 fine

Health and Safety Executive v Inflite Engineering Ltd (2017) Chelmsford magistrates’ court, March 15

Statutory reference: ss. 2 and 3 of the Health and Safety at Work, etc., Act 1974 (HSWA).

Inflite Engineering Ltd, an aircraft engineering company, has been fined after two workers suffered injuries when they fell from the tail of an aeroplane.

The facts

· In June 2015 two men were carrying out checks on the tail of an aeroplane at Stansted Airport. They were working on either side of the tail, using elevated work platforms, when another worker closed the wrong circuit breaker. This activated the aircraft’s air brake and both work platforms were knocked over.

· The workers fell between 10 and 15 feet. One, an employee of the company, suffered multiple fractures and a punctured lung. The other, an agency worker, suffered fractures.

· No suitable risk assessment was in place and there was a lack of effective monitoring.


The company was fined £160,000 plus £5400 costs under ss. 2 and 3, HSWA.

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page