top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Explosion at chemical company’s site: £1.2 million fine

Explosion at chemicals company site: £1.2 million fine

Health and Safety Executive v Industrial Chemicals Ltd (2017) Chelmsford Crown Court, July 7

Statutory reference: regulation 4 of the Control of Major Hazards Regulations 1999 (CMHR).

Industrial Chemicals Ltd has been fined following an explosion at its site in West Thurrock.

The facts

· In September 2013 a newly installed hydrochloric acid burner exploded, causing significant damage at the site.Two workers suffered minor injuries.

· In an attempt to address risks from chlorine, the company had routed vent gas containing mostly hydrogen to the site’s emergency scrubber where it came into contact with oxygen or chlorine which exploded when it came into contact with an ignition source.

The decision

The company was fined £1.2 million plus £35,000 costs under regulation 4 of CMHR>

Recent Posts

See All

VICARIOUS LIABILITY

Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page