top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Ebbw Vale factory explosion: worker injured: £40,000 fine

Health and Safety Executive v Sears Manufacturing Company (Europe) Ltd (2016) Cwmbran magistrates’ court, April 22

Sears Manufacturing, a vehicle seat manufacturing company, has been fined after a worker suffered burns in an explosion.

Significant points of the case

  • In January 2015 an operator at the company’s site in Ebbw Vale was working with a highly flammable release agent, used to prevent dispensed foam sticking to seat moulds.

  • The release agent ignited and exploded. The operator suffered burns to his head and hands.

  • A failure to have suitable control measures in place caused the release agent to ignite.

The company was fined £40,000 plus £12,000 costs for breaches of regulations 5, 6 and 9, Dangerous Substances and Explosive Atmosphere Regulations 2002 (DSEAR).

DSEAR aims to protect people from fires and explosions arising from dangerous substances in the workplace. The regulations create a duty on employers to ensure that risks of fire and explosion arising from dangerous substances are assessed thoroughly and either eliminated or reduced so far as is reasonably practicable.

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page