• Robert Spicer

Disability discrimination: harassment and victimisation: covert surveillance

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION

Harassment and victimisation

Covert surveillance

Case Baker v Peninsula Business Services Ltd (2016) Eq Opp Rev 271:22, East London ET

Facts B suffered from dyslexia. He was employed by P as an advocate. The employer imposed covert surveillance of B on the basis of a suspicion that he was not devoting all his time to his work duties and that he was taking on private work. B complained of disability discrimination. He alleged that the surveillance amounted to harassment related to disability and victimisation arising from the protected acts of raising his disability.

Decision 1. The complaints were upheld.

  1. The decision to impose covert surveillance had been triggered by the employee claiming that he had a disability.

  2. Informing the employee of the surveillance in the context of disciplinary proceedings was harassment related to disability.

  3. The imposition of the surveillance was victimisation because it was in response to B raising his disability.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Disability discrimination and the menopause

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION Disability Menopause Case Rooney v Leicester City Council EA-2020-000070-DA, EAT Facts Ms R made a number of complaints to the ET, including sex and disability discrimination

Disability discrimination and dismissal

DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION Dismissal tainted by discrimination Case P2CG v Davis (2021) Morning Star, November 9, EAT Facts D was employed by P as a business development director. In 2015 the company h

Disability discrimination law problems

Disability discrimination The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) is a good example of the modern mystification of a new area of law. The aim of the Act (now replaced with minor amendments by the Equa