• Robert Spicer

Dangerous roof work in sight of health and safety managers

Dangerous roof work: suspended sentence for employer

Health and Safety Executive v Smith (2017) Leeds Crown Court, September 13

Statutory reference: regulation 6 of the Work at Height Regulations 2005 (WAHR)

The facts

· In November 2015 Chris Smith, a roofing contractor, was engaged to carry out roof repairs to a guest house in Northallerton. Scaffolding was erected along the full length of the roof at the front of the property.

· Because there was a conservatory at the back of the property, only a partial scaffold was erected. This left two-thirds of the rear roof edge unprotected.

· Health and safety managers at North Yorkshire County Council could see the work from their office window. They had concerns about two workers on the roof where there were inadequate fall measures in place. Two workers were at risk of falling seven metres from the roof.

The decision

Smith was sentenced to eight months imprisonment, suspended for two years. He was ordered to carry out 200 hours community service and to pay £5800 costs.

An HSE inspector commented after the case that work at height is a high-risk activity which accounts for a high proportion of workplace serious injuries and fatalities each year.



0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil