• Robert Spicer

Asbestos disturbance: charitable trust and contractor fined

Asbestos failings: charitable trust and contractor fined

Health and Safety Executive v The Williamson Trust and Mark Tucker (2016) Chatham magistrates’ court, January 6

The Williamson Trust and Mark Tucker have been fined after disturbing asbestos and continuing to work in a building.

Significant points of the case

  • The Williamson Trust operates a school academy. It contracted Mark Tucker to refurbish a block at the academy.

  • In July 2012 Tucker carried out the work, knowing that the Trust had an asbestos register identifying the location of asbestos.

  • The Trust failed to complete a refurbishment and demolition survey. The asbestos register was not checked as required by law.

The Williamson Trust was fined £18,000 plus £17,000 costs for a breach of section 3, HSW Act, for failing to ensure the health and safety of non-employees.

Mark Tucker was fined £9000 plus £8000 costs under regulation 13, Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007.

Recent Posts

See All

DoNotPay and popular facial recognition tools

Legal tech company DoNotPay is best known for its army of “robot lawyers” — automated bots that tackle boringonline tasks like canceling TV subscriptions and requesting refunds from parking meters. No


Case management decision Access to documents Case Kular v Atos IT Services UK Ltd (2021) UKEAT 0101/20/2901, Employment Appeal Tribunal Facts K claimed that a costs hearing was procedurally unfair. Un