top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Supreme Court Hold LLP Members Are “Workers”

Yesterday (21st May 2014), the Supreme Court ruled that partners of a solicitors’ firm were protected by the whistle-blowing legislation, marking the start of a new era for the first whistle-blowing case against LLP’s.

The Court held that partners were a “worker” for the purposes of employment law legislation. The implications can therefore extend into finance, accounting and legal services due to the LLP structure favoured in these industries.

The decision enables a former Clydes partner to continue pursuing her unfair dismissal case, alongside her sex discrimination by reason of pregnancy claim. This case will now be remitted to the employment tribunal to consider both claims.

It is hoped that the decision will mean that LLPs ensure proper whistle-blowing procedures are in place, which will in turn create greater transparency in the corporate world. We wait to see whether a later Court will extend the definition to “employee”, thereby heightening LLP duties towards their members further.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page