• Robert Spicer

More redundancy law and practice


Temporary Lay-Offs

Workers can claim statutory redundancy pay that they are eligible for and have been temporarily laid off, without pay or less than half a week’s pay for either:

· More than 4 weeks in a row

· More than 6 non-consecutive weeks in a 13-week period.

Employers must be informed of the intention to claim statutory redundancy pay within 4 weeks of the last non-working day in the 4 or 6-week period.

The claim could be rejected if normal work is likely to start within 4 weeks and continue for at least 13 weeks.

Reduction of redundancy payments:

· Misconduct

· Employees nearing retiring age.

Where an employer fails to pay, the redundant worker may apply for payment direct from National Insurance Fund.

Disputes are referred to Employment Tribunal: section 170, ERA.

Redundancy payments not subject to recoupment.

Time limit for claims: six months from “relevant date”

Relevant dates:

· Contract terminated by notice: date when notice expires

· Contract terminated without notice: date of termination

· Fixed term contract: date on which fixed term expires

· Employee taken to have been dismissed: date on which notice expires

· Special rules where employee worked for trial period.

Where an employee has a contract which allows them to be temporarily laid off without pay, or put on shorter working hours with a cut in pay, sections 147 to 150 of ERA apply. These rules apply where a worker has been laid off or placed on short-time for at least four consecutive weeks or 6 weeks in a 13-week period. There is a procedure for notices and counter-notices which allows the worker to resign and claim redundancy pay.

Craig v Bob Linfield and Son: C was employed by B for 10 years. His contract included the right for the employer to lay off workers for an indefinite period without pay. C was laid off for four weeks. He complained of unfair constructive dismissal on the basis that the lay-off had been longer than was reasonable and that B was in repudiatory breach of contract. The ET dismissed the complaint. C appealed to the EAT.

The EAT dismissed the appeal. It stated that Parliament had provided a statutory scheme which provided for a four-week period during which there was no entitlement to claim a redundancy payment. Even if there were an implied term that a period of lay off would extend no longer than was reasonable, Parliament had set out a four-week benchmark from which there would have to be cogent and well-evidenced reasons to depart. There were no such reasons in this case.


Craig v Bob Linfield & Son Ltd UKEAT/0220/15

Recent Posts

See All

Redundancy: significant cases

MISCELLANEOUS CASES Written notice Haywood v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2018] UKSC 22, Supreme Court The Trust identified H’s post as redundant. If her employment terminated b

Redundancy: time off to look for work

TIME OFF TO LOOK FOR WORK Employees with at least two years continuous employment are entitled to reasonable time off during a redundancy dismissal notice period. Reasonableness involves a balance bet

Redundancy and disability discrimination

Disability Disabled workers may be selected for redundancy because of the employer’s failure to make reasonable adjustments to allow for their disability. The disabled may be disadvantaged in selectio