top of page
  • Writer's pictureRobert Spicer

Whistleblowing: new case


Claim form


Case Petrica v Central London Community NHS Trust [2021] UKEAT 0059_20_1205

Facts P, a litigant in person, complained that his claim of whistleblowing had not been considered. The claim had not been stated in the list of agreed issues. P had applied to amend his claim to include whistleblowing. This was refused. P argued that the ET should have considered the contents of the claim form.

Decision 1. The appeal was dismissed.

2. It was not enough that Box 10 of the claim form had been locked. The aim of the Box was to enable the Tribunal Service to forward such claims to the relevant regulator.

3. The Box did not give rise to a whistleblowing claim on its own if no relevant particulars were included in the body of the claim. In this case, no such particulars had been included.

4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


Limitation Case TVZ v Manchester City Football Club Ltd [2022] EWHC 7, Hugh Court Facts Eight men who had been sexually abused by a football coach in the 1980s claimed compensation in negligence fro

Crown immunity and the rule of law (3)

Civil proceedings Until 1948 the Crown could not be made a party to a civil action. This was an offshoot of the principle of sovereign immunity. The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 changed this rule. The C

Crown immunity and the rule of law (2)

Recent examples In June 2018 prison officers were taking part in a petrol bomb training exercise. This was part of an eight-day commanders course at the National Tactical Response Group training facil


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page