• Robert Spicer

New disability discrimination case


Discrimination arising from disability

Legitimate aim

Case Stott v Ralli Ltd EA-2019-000772-VP

Facts S was employed as a paralegal by R. R dismissed her for poor performance. It accepted that she had a mental impairment which amounted to a disability, but denied knowledge of the disability. S later stated that she was dyslexic and that this had affected her performance. She complained of discrimination arising from disability. The ET dismissed the claim. It found that R had the legitimate aim of maintaining a high standard of accuracy in written communications. R had made unsuccessful efforts to improve S’s performance and these, and her dismissal, were a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. S appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Decision 1. The claim was dismissed.

2. At the time of dismissal, R did not know about the disability.

3. The justification defence had been made out.

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

LEGAL AID Legal aid was conceived as a cornerstone of the welfare state. The system was created by the Legal Aid etc Act 1949 as part of the welfare state at a time when free access to justice was reg

Money is the key which unlocks the meaning of English law. Lord Bingham has commented that equality before the law is an aspect of the rule of law. He stated his view that the laws of the land should

In 2018 the UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights reported that in the UK 14 million people, a fifth of the population, live in poverty. Four million of them are more than 50 per c