• Robert Spicer

Bristol Health and Safety Prosecution

£12,700 fine Health and Safety Executive v Clear Channel UK Ltd (2012) Bristol magistrates’ court, August 20. Clear Channel UK Ltd, an outdoor advertising company, has been fined after an employee’s hand was caught in a petrol-powered lawnmower. Significant points of the case • In August 2011 a maintenance worker, who wishes to remain anonymous, employed by Clear Channel, was working at a billboard site in Bath Road, Bristol. • He tried to clear a blockage from a petrol-powered mower which he was operating. He thought that the mower had been turned off. As he tried to remove the blockage, the mower’s blade started to rotate. His thumb was almost severed and his fingers were severely injured. • A 14 hour surgical procedure was needed to reattach his thumb and repair the damaged fingers. • A safety feature which cuts out the engine of the mower and stops the blades rotating was not working properly. • Clear Channel did not have an effective reporting and maintenance system for reporting faults in equipment. It had allowed a lawnmower which was not in good repair or efficient working order to be used by its employees. The company was fined £12,700 plus £13,000 costs for a breach of regulation 5 of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER). A spokesperson for the HSE commented that the company had failed to take the necessary steps to protect its employees from harm through the use of non-maintained or ill-maintained equipment. These failures led to serious injury to an employee who has only been able to return to work in the last couple of months. Regulation 5 of PUWER states that every employer shall ensure that work equipment is maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good order.

Recent Posts

See All

Health and safety and automatically unfair dismissal

UNFAIR DISMISSAL: Automatically unfair: Health and safety activities In the recent case of Sinclair v Trackwork Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) gave guidance on these issues. The facts, in s


Those who ridicule health and safety as “Elf ‘n’ Safety” and who argue for deregulation and a reduction in red tape, need to be aware of the horrific consequences of breaches of health and safety law


WORKERS: HEALTH AND SAFETY PROTECTION Employment Rights Act 1996 (Protection from Detriment in Health and Safety Cases) (Amendment) Order 2021 Section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 states, in s